The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View all content recommended for you
As previously reported on the ALL Hub, the CD3/CD19 bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab is superior to high-risk third-course consolidation chemotherapy (HC3), prolonging event-free survival (EFS) in children with high-risk first relapse B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the initial results indicated that blinatumomab could have further clinical benefits than those detected in the study; patients treated with blinatumomab had a significantly lower incidence of EFS compared with those who received intensive multidrug chemotherapy. Here, we summarize recently reported results from a post hoc measurable residual disease (MRD) analysis of this phase III study (NCT02393859) by Locatelli, et al., in Pediatric Blood Cancer. The analysis aimed to assess the impact of blinatumomab versus HC3 on MRD, EFS, and overall survival (OS) across different MRD levels and reveal the underlying mechanism behind these observations.1
MRD is an independent prognostic indicator in B-ALL and is important for risk stratification and treatment planning. Notably, persistence of MRD after induction chemotherapy and prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be predictive of disease recurrence. MRD assays can detect small quantities of malignant cells that may be missed by other detection methods.
Children >28 days and <18 years of age with high-risk first relapse B-ALL in cytomorphological complete remission (M1 marrow, <5% blasts), or with M2 marrow (blasts ≥5% and <25%), were eligible for enrollment. In addition, patients who completed induction and the first two cycles of high-risk consolidation therapy (HC1 and HC2) were also included, while those who were refractory to induction or relapsed during HC1/HC2 were excluded.
Enrolled patients were randomized to receive a third course of consolidation chemotherapy, involving either one cycle of blinatumomab (15 μg/m2/day, 4 weeks, continuous intravenous infusion; N = 54) or a third cycle of intensive multidrug chemotherapy (HC3; N = 54).
In the post hoc analysis, patients with MRD of <10−4 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were grouped as either having positive but not quantifiable (pbnq) or undetectable disease. Multiparametric flow cytometry data were used if MRD was not evaluable by PCR. The primary endpoint was EFS, and key secondary endpoints included OS and MRD remission. MRD was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR of clonal T-cell receptor or immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and by multiparametric flow cytometry, with molecular remission being defined as MRD <10−4 cells. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine EFS and OS by end of induction (EOI) and end of second consolidation (baseline) MRD status.
To determine the point at which patients with MRD ≥10−4 at EOI responded to blinatumomab, MRD remission data on Day 15 and Day 29 were also compared.
As previously reported, blinatumomab induces high rates of MRD remission in adults and children with B-ALL. This subgroup analysis has revealed that MRD remission following blinatumomab is deeper than that achieved with HC3, explaining why patients with MRD <10−4 remission at baseline experienced improved rates of EFS and OS following treatment with blinatumomab. This also elucidates why patients with persistent MRD following HC1 and HC2 received little benefit from HC3, while treatment with blinatumomab was able to drive MRD remission. In addition, blinatumomab was able to eliminate the poor prognostic impact of persistent MRD after induction and at baseline. It was also observed that a large majority of patients with MRD at baseline were able to achieve MRD remission by Day 15 when treated with blinatumomab and maintain it through to Day 29.
These findings support the use of blinatumomab in the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk first relapse B-ALL, including those with MRD levels <10−4 prior to beginning treatment. A longer follow-up period combined with deeper analysis afforded by next-generation sequencing technologies may provide even further insights.
References