All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your ALL Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Bookmark this article
CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated promising outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL); however, 30%–50% of this patient population experience relapse. Bispecific CAR approaches that simultaneously target CD19 and CD22 are an effective treatment option and have successfully reduced antigen-escape-based relapse rates.
Below, we summarize the results of a phase II trial published by Pan et al. in Lancet Oncology, highlighting the safety and efficacy of sequential CD19-directed and CD22-directed CAR T-cell treatments in patients with R/R B-ALL.
This was a single center, single-arm, phase II trial that included:
Before each CAR T-cell infusion, patients received fludarabine (30 mg/m² per day) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m² per day) intravenously on Days −5, −4, and −3 to reach lymphodepletion.
Patients were infused with fresh CD19-directed CAR T cells intravenously, followed by CD22-directed CAR T cells immediately after manufacture, and once measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) was reached, and all adverse events (AEs) were Grade 2 or better (except hematologic AEs).
Treatment cycles were defined as:
The primary endpoint was objective response rate, including MRD-negative CR and CRi 3 months after the infusion.
The secondary endpoints included:
Overall, 81 patients were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Patient characteristics*
Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated) |
All treated patients |
---|---|
Median age, years (IQR) |
8 (6–10) |
Sex |
|
Female |
38 |
Male |
62 |
Race |
|
Asian |
100 |
Ethnicity |
|
Chinese Han |
91 |
Chinese ethnic minorities† |
9 |
Extramedullary disease |
|
Any |
19 |
Diffuse‡ |
1 |
Testicular |
6 |
CNS |
9 |
Other locations§ |
2 |
ECOG performance |
|
0–1 |
98 |
2 |
2 |
Relapsed or refractory subgroup |
|
Relapsed after last therapy |
68 |
Refractory to last therapy |
32 |
Number of previous lines of therapy |
|
1 |
38 |
2 |
41 |
≥3 |
21 |
Previous HSCT |
|
Yes |
12 |
No |
88 |
Baseline marrow blasts by morphology‖ |
|
<5% |
42 |
≥5% to <50% |
38 |
≥50% |
20 |
Genetic features¶ |
|
Favorable |
22 |
Unfavorable |
11 |
CNS, central nervous system; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IQR, interquartile range. |
At a median follow-up of 17.7 months, a total of 79 patients received sequential CAR T-cell therapy; two patients discontinued the study after CD19-directed CAR T-cell infusion; therefore, did not receive the CD22-directed CAR T-cells.
Overall, 81 patients received the target dose of CD19-directed CAR T cells (median 2.7 × 10⁶ cells per kg [interquartile range, 1.1 × 10⁶ to 3.7 × 10⁶]) and CD22-directed CAR T cells (2.2 × 10⁶ cells per kg [interquartile range, 1.1 × 10⁶ to 3.8 × 10⁶]). Two patients received the target dose of CD19-directed but not of CD22-directed CAR T cells.
Figure 1. A 3-month response rate in patients who received target dose (n = 62) B 3-month response rate in all treated patients (N = 81)*
CR, complete remission; CRi, CR with incomplete hematological recovery; PR, partial remission.
*Adapted from Pan, et al.1
All patients experienced AEs (Table 2), none required dose reductions or discontinuation due to toxicity, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Severe cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity events occurred less frequently in Cycle 2 than in Cycle 1.
Table 2. Adverse events
Adverse events, n (%) |
Cycle 1 (N = 81) |
Cycle 2 (N = 79) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 1–2 |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
Grade 1–2 |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
|
Any† |
30% |
40% |
31% |
32% |
43% |
25% |
CRS‡ |
74% |
15% |
1% |
68% |
3% |
3% |
ICANS§ |
23% |
4% |
1% |
16% |
1% |
0 |
Infection† |
5% |
4% |
0 |
5% |
5% |
0 |
Hematologic† |
41% |
30% |
30% |
38% |
38% |
24% |
CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. |
In this phase II trial, sequential CD19-directed and CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy induced deep and sustainable responses and demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile in childhood R/R B-cell ALL. A further randomized controlled trial is being planned due to these findings.
Subscribe to get the best content related to ALL delivered to your inbox