All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

The ALL Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your ALL Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2023-10-23T14:11:29.000Z

Global socioeconomic disparities in ALL: toxicity in Brazil and Guatemala

Oct 23, 2023
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite new clinical developments in ALL.

Bookmark this article

Global socioeconomic disparities in ALL: toxicity in Brazil and Guatemala

This series of podcasts covers global socioeconomic disparity in ALL. In this episode, the ALL Hub asked Eduardo Chapchap, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, BR and Federico Antillion, Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala City, GT about disparities in toxicity and their management in ALL, including:

  • What are the toxicities you encountered while treating patients with ALL and how did you manage them?
  • What are the barriers contributing to poor toxicity management?

Chapchap and Antillion discussed socioeconomic disparities in ALL across high middle-income countries (HMIC), low middle-income countries (LMIC), and within adult and pediatric populations.

Chapchap mentioned common toxicities such as infections and neutropenia, which are becoming easier to manage considering the increased access to antifungal medications, antibiotics, and preventative measures. Early and long-term neurological toxicities are also common and, although these are more challenging to manage, there are preventative measures in place, such as reducing the dose of cytarabine and methotrexate, reducing the dose in older patients, omitting the use of cranial radiation, and supportive care measures. Other adverse effects, include asparaginase-related toxicities such as thrombosis in adult patients, are generally treated with prophylactic heparins and/or avoiding fibrinogen replacement. Hypertriglyceridemia and liver toxicities are common asparaginase toxicities that are often managed by dose reductions in patients who are overweight.

Antillion discussed that febrile neutropenia and septic shock are often related to chemotherapy induction. Infection management involves the use of different types of prophylactic measures. Bleeding events also occur, which are related to a low platelet count. While patients can face asparaginase-related toxicities, the most common toxicities are severe cases of acute pancreatitis. Anthracycline-based medication can cause medium and long-term cardiac toxicities in pediatric ALL, which can impact quality of life.

[[references1]]

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to ALL delivered to your inbox