The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View all content recommended for you
Despite advancements in treatment strategies for older patients with ALL (>55 years), the current SoC strategies continue to be associated with high rates of early mortality, significant toxicities, and poor prognosis. Results of the phase II INITIAL-1 (NCT03460522) trial, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of InO combined with dexamethasone as a frontline induction therapy for older patients with Ph− B-ALL, were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Stelljes et al.1 |
Key learnings |
100% of evaluable patients (n = 43) experienced a CR or CRi after two cycles of InO combined with dexamethasone. |
MRD assessment revealed a molecular CR in 71% of patients after a third cycle of treatment. |
After a median follow-up of 2.7 years, the 1- and 3-year EFS rates were 88% and 55%, respectively, with 1- and 3-year OS rates of 91% and 73%. |
The most frequent Grade ≥3 AEs during induction therapy included leukocytopenia in 74%, neutropenia in 56%, thrombocytopenia in 49%, and anemia in 37%. |
Throughout the 3-year follow-up period, the cumulative incidence of relapse was 27%. |
These data demonstrate the feasibility of InO as a novel induction strategy in Ph− ALL, offering an alternative to traditional induction therapies for older patients who may not be able to tolerate intensive chemotherapy. |
InO can be administered in the community, reducing the need for hospitalization and therefore preserving quality of life. |
There is a need for further trials to establish optimal dosing regimens and to evaluate alternative combinations to further improve patient outcomes. |
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; B-ALL, B-cell ALL; CR, complete response; CRi, complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery; EFS, event-free survival; InO, inotuzumab ozogamicin; MRD, measurable residual disease; OS, overall survival; Ph−, Philadelphia chromosome-negative; SoC, standard of care.
This educational resource is independently supported by Pfizer. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee; funders are allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content