TRANSLATE

The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Is next-generation sequencing a useful tool for the risk stratification of patients with T-ALL?

By Quintina Dawson

Share:

Featured:

Loic Vasseur

Jan 19, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in ALL


During the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the ALL Hub spoke with Loïc Vasseur, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, FR. We asked, Is next-generation sequencing (NGS) a useful tool for the risk stratification of patients with T-ALL?

Is next-generation sequencing a useful tool for the risk stratification of patients with T-ALL?

Vasseur first highlights the gene alterations that have been identified as prognostic factors in T-ALL; including NOTCH1 and FBXW7, which are associated with a good prognostic impact; or TP53, p10, and DNMT3A, which are associated with an adverse prognostic impact. Currently, there is no consensus on risk stratification in T-ALL.

Then, Vasseur reviews the existing data on the role of NGS in the prognostic stratification of patients with T-ALL. Recent work, presented during ASH, demonstrated that NGS can identify other important gene alterations to stratify patients at a higher risk of relapse. Given the complexity of identifying prognostic factors, response to treatment and biological markers can also be used to determine the type and intensification of chemotherapy regimens, such as asparaginase, and to provide indications for the use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

NGS is also crucial when deciding the subgroup of patients that may benefit from targeted therapies; for example, patients with alterations in PHF6 or epigenetic regulators could benefit from BCL-2 inhibitors.

He concludes by emphasizing the importance of NGS for risk stratification in first-line T-ALL treatment, particularly the early adaptation of chemotherapy prior to minimal residual disease results and to guide the use of targeted therapies.


More about...