All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your ALL Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
During the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the ALL Hub spoke with Loïc Vasseur, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, FR. We asked, Is next-generation sequencing (NGS) a useful tool for the risk stratification of patients with T-ALL?
Is next-generation sequencing a useful tool for the risk stratification of patients with T-ALL?
Vasseur first highlights the gene alterations that have been identified as prognostic factors in T-ALL; including NOTCH1 and FBXW7, which are associated with a good prognostic impact; or TP53, p10, and DNMT3A, which are associated with an adverse prognostic impact. Currently, there is no consensus on risk stratification in T-ALL.
Then, Vasseur reviews the existing data on the role of NGS in the prognostic stratification of patients with T-ALL. Recent work, presented during ASH, demonstrated that NGS can identify other important gene alterations to stratify patients at a higher risk of relapse. Given the complexity of identifying prognostic factors, response to treatment and biological markers can also be used to determine the type and intensification of chemotherapy regimens, such as asparaginase, and to provide indications for the use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
NGS is also crucial when deciding the subgroup of patients that may benefit from targeted therapies; for example, patients with alterations in PHF6 or epigenetic regulators could benefit from BCL-2 inhibitors.
He concludes by emphasizing the importance of NGS for risk stratification in first-line T-ALL treatment, particularly the early adaptation of chemotherapy prior to minimal residual disease results and to guide the use of targeted therapies.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to ALL delivered to your inbox