The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View all content recommended for you
Despite the development of novel therapeutic and chemotherapeutic agents, a great percentage of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) respond badly to treatment and have poor prognosis.1 Effective anti-leukemic activity in ALL xenografts seems to be achieved when venetoclax, a highly selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor, is combined with the anti-BCL-2 and anti-BCL-extra-large (BCL-XL) inhibitor, navitoclax.2 These findings indicate that a dual BCL-2 and BCL-XL inhibition might provide a new treatment combination for patients with R/R ALL or LL.
During the 2020 European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Congress, our ALL Hub Steering Committee member, Elias Jabbour, presented results from a phase I trial (NCT03181126) investigating the combination of venetoclax and navitoclax for pediatric and adult R/R ALL and LL. We hereby provide a summary of these results.
Figure 1. Study design of the phase I trial investigating venetoclax plus navitoclax in R/R ALL and LL2
Table 1. Patient baseline characteristics2
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; BM, bone marrow; CAR T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; LL, lymphoblastic lymphoma; SCT, stem cell transplantation |
|
Baseline characteristic |
All patients (N = 47) |
---|---|
Median age (range), years Pediatric (< 18 years old) |
29 (6–72) 26% |
Males, % |
62 |
Type of primary cancer, % B-ALL T-ALL LL |
53 40 6 |
ECOG PS, % 1 2 |
72 14 |
Baseline BM blasts Median (range) ALL patients with < 5% |
52% (0–99) 11% |
Median number of prior lines (range) Had prior blinatumomab, % Had prior inotuzumab ozogamicin, % Had prior CAR T, % Had prior SCT, % |
4 (1–10) 28 15
13 28 |
Median time since last therapy, months (range) |
2 (0.1–21) |
Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, % |
43 |
Table 2. Most common Grade 3–4 TEAEs2
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events |
|||
TEAEs (N = 47) |
Grade 3–4 (≥ 15% of patients), % |
Possible association to venetoclax/navitoclax, % |
|
---|---|---|---|
Any |
98 |
74 |
|
Hematological |
|||
Febrile neutropenia |
47 |
19 |
|
Neutropenia |
28 |
21 |
|
Anemia |
17 |
9 |
|
Thrombocytopenia |
26 |
21 |
|
Non-hematological |
|||
Hypokalemia |
23 |
2 |
|
ALT increase |
19 |
4 |
|
Sepsis |
19 |
4 |
|
Blood bilirubin increase |
15 |
4 |
|
Pneumonia |
15 |
2 |
Table 3. Preliminary efficacy of navitoclax plus venetoclax in R/R ALL and LL patients2
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; BM, bone marrow; CAR T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; CR, complete response; CRi, CR with incomplete count recovery; CRp, CR with incomplete platelet recovery; DoR, duration of response; MRD, measurable residual disease; LL, lymphoblastic lymphoma; NE, not evaluable; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PR, partial response; SCT, stem cell transplantation |
||||
Response |
B-ALL (n = 25) |
T-ALL (n = 19) |
LL (n = 3) |
All patients (N = 47) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CR, CRi, CRp, % ALL patients with ≥ 5% BM blasts, % ALL patients with morphologic CR at baseline, % |
64 65 NE |
53 50 75 |
67 — — |
60 59 75 |
PR, % |
12 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
MRD-negative CR, CRi, CRp in ALL, % |
56 |
60 |
— |
58 |
Median DoR, (95% CI), months |
9.1 (1.4–14.6) |
4.2 (0.8–12.3) |
NE (NE–NE) |
4.2 (2.3–11.5) |
Median OS (95% CI), months |
9.7 (4.0–15.7) |
6.6 (3.2–12.5) |
NR (2.0–NE) |
7.8 (4.0–12.5) |
Proceeded to SCT or CAR T, % |
32 |
16 |
67 |
28 |
The results of this phase I trial indicate that the combination of venetoclax and low-dose navitoclax is well tolerated in patients with R/R ALL or LL, at the recommended phase II dose of 400 mg of venetoclax and 25/50 mg of navitoclax (weight-dependent). Prolonged cytopenia is the most relevant safety concern with this treatment combination. The preliminary efficacy data are very promising especially due to the heavily pretreated nature of this patient population with high rates of MRD negative complete remissions. A clinical follow-up with biomarker analysis, as well as a safety expansion cohort with 21-day treatment cycles to manage the observed prolonged blood count recoveries, are currently ongoing.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content