All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen, Autolus, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Biologics license application for Orca-T for hematological malignancies granted priority review by FDA

Oct 8, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in ALL.


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review to a biologics license application (BLA) seeking approval of the allogeneic T-cell immunotherapy Orca-T for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).1 

The FDA assigned a target action date for the BLA of April 6, 2026, under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA).1 The BLA submission is based on data from the pivotal phase III study, Precision-T (NCT04013685), a randomized, open-label, multicenter study evaluating Orca-T compared with conventional allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) for the treatment of AML, ALL, high-risk MDS, and mixed-phenotype acute leukemia.1,2 

Precision-T key data2

Patients (N = 187) were randomized to receive Orca-T plus single-agent tacrolimus (Tac) or allo-HSCT + Tac + methotrexate. Both groups received myeloablative conditioning and received transplantation from a related or unrelated matched donor. The median follow-up was 11.4 months across both treatment arms. 

  • The primary endpoint of survival free of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) was 78% in patients who received Orca-T (n = 93) vs 38% in patients who received conventional allo-HSCT (n = 94); 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 65–87% and 26–51%, respectively.
  • The estimated overall survival (OS) rates in the interim analysis were 94% and 83% in the Orca-T and allo-HSCT arms, respectively (95% CI, 86–97% and 73–90%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; p = 0.11823).
  • The secondary endpoint of cumulative incidence of moderate-to-severe cGvHD was 13%  in the Orca-T arm (95% CI, 5–23%) vs 44%  in the allo-HSCT arm (95% CI, 31–56%).
  • The cumulative incidence of Grade 3 or 4 GvHD was 6% in the Orca-T arm vs 17% in the allo-HSCT arms.
  • The relapse-free survival rate was 76% in patients treated with Orca-T vs 74% in those who received allo-HSCT (HR, 0.80; p = 0.49).
  • No new safety issues were reported with Orca-T; 6% of patients in the Orca-T arm and 10% of patients in the allo-HSCT arm experienced Grade ≥4 infections. 

Following positive results of the Precision-T study, acceptance of the Orca-T BLA marks an important clinical development for patients with AML, ALL, and MDS.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content