All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen, Autolus, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Busulfan exposure and allo-HSCT outcomes in pediatric ALL

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Apr 10, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


An analysis evaluating the optimal busulfan exposure window in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT; N = 145) was published in Blood Advances by Ben Hassine et al. Busulfan-treated patients with high-risk or relapsed ALL enrolled in the phase III FORUM trial (NCT01949129) and its pharmacogenetic add-on study (NCT02670564) were included. Patients received fludarabine + busulfan + thiotepa conditioning. The primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). 

Key data: With a median follow-up of 5 years, based on EFS and GRFS data, the optimal busulfan exposure window was defined as a cumulative area under the concentration curve (cAUC) of 73.3–98.0 mg.h/L. Patients who received non-optimal busulfan exposure (<73.3 or >98.0 mg.h/L) had a lower EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–3.14; p = 0.008) and GRFS (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.29–3.13; p = 0.002) vs those who had optimal exposure. Underexposure was associated with higher relapse rates (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.11–3.35; p = 0.026), while overexposure was associated with increased cumulative treatment-related toxicities and extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD). In a post hoc matched analysis (n = 51 per group), outcomes were comparable between optimally exposed patients and those receiving total-body irradiation (TBI). 

Key learning: An optimal busulfan exposure window was identified and associated with improved post-allo-HSCT outcomes in pediatric patients with ALL, supporting exposure-guided conditioning and highlighting chemotherapy-based conditioning as a potential alternative to TBI for selected patients. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content