All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen, Autolus, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

EHA/ELN guidance on blast reporting in acute leukemias

Share:

Oct 29, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


Representatives from the European Hematology Association (EHA) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) produced consensus guidance on harmonized blast assessment to define response categories in patients with acute leukemia, published by Wang et al. in Haematologica

Key data: The panel recommends measurable residual disease (MRD) assays replace morphology as the gold standard to assess bone marrow remission in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), with minimum validated sensitivity of 0.01%. Morphological blast count ≥5% does not define persistent disease or relapse unless confirmed by appropriate MRD assay. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), it is strongly recommended to perform MRD using an appropriate assay with a minimum validated threshold of 0.1%. Morphological blast count ≥5% does not define persistent disease or relapse if the MRD assay or other diagnostic test for genetic abnormalities in AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is negative. 

Key learning: Establishing standardized criteria and implementing internationally harmonized procedures are crucial for ensuring uniform response and relapse assessment in acute leukemias. These harmonized criteria should improve the consistency and quality of this data entry across clinical trials and broader clinical practice.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

What is your perception of incorporating blinatumomab into upfront ALL treatment regimens alongside traditional chemotherapy and pegaspargase?