All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.
The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen and Autolus. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View ALL content recommended for you
Results from a post hoc pooled analysis of the phase I/II B1931010 (NCT01363297), phase III INO-VATE (NCT01564784), and phase IV B1931030 (NCT03677596) studies, evaluating inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) across different body mass index (BMI) subgroups in 338 adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD22+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) were published in Targeted Oncology by Stock et al. Subgroups included patients with a BMI <25 kg/m2 (normal; n = 155), 25–30 kg/m2 (overweight; n = 116), and >30 kg/m2 (obese; n = 67).
Key data: Complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) was observed in 69.7%, 75.9%, 68.7%, and 84.6% of patients in the <25, 25–30, >30, and >40 kg/m² BMI subgroups, respectively. The 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 19.9%, 12.8%, 10.9%, and 23.1%, while the 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 28.1%, 22.1%, 17.5%, and 23.1% in the <25, 25–30, >30, and >40 kg/m² BMI subgroups, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 98.1%, 96.6%, and 98.5% of patients in the <25, 25–30, and >30 kg/m² BMI subgroups, respectively. The most common Grade ≥3 TEAEs were similar across BMI groups and included neutropenia (36.1%), thrombocytopenia (34.9%), febrile neutropenia (23.7%), anemia (18.9%), leukopenia (17.2%), lymphopenia (8.3%), sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS; 8.3%), increased gamma-glutamyl transferase (5.9%), and pneumonia (5.6%)
Key learning: In this post hoc analysis, efficacy and safety outcomes were broadly consistent across BMI subgroups in adults with R/R CD22+ B-ALL, supporting the use of InO without dose-capping in this population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.