All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen and Autolus. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Inotuzumab ozogamicin dose optimization in R/R ALL

By Megan Moore

Share:

Sep 25, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


An evaluation of dose-optimization strategies for single-agent inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) in adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD22+ B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were published in Leukemia & Lymphoma by DeAngelo et al. The review follows a post-marketing requirement issued by the FDA, reflecting concerns that the proposed dose of 1.8 mg/m²/cycle may not optimally balance the safety and efficacy of InO monotherapy.

Key data: Based on pooled data from the phase I/II B1931010 (NCT01363297) and phase III INO-VATE (NCT01564784) trials, the starting dose of 1.8 mg/m2/cycle had a greater clinical utility index (CUI) compared with lower doses in patients with median exposure, regardless of whether they proceeded to post-treatment hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the phase IV post-marketing requirement study (NCT03677596), which included patients at higher risk of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) / sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), the starting dose of 1.8 mg/m2/cycle had a greater CUI compared with 1.2 mg/m2/cycle in a R/R ALL patient with median exposure at the respective dose. The complete remission (CR) / CR with incomplete hematologic recoery recovery (CRi) rates at 1.2 mg/m2/cycle and 1.8 mg/m2/cycle were 71.9% and 68.4%, respectively; among responders, MRD-negativity rates were 71.7% and 69.2%, respectively. VOD rates post-HSCT at 1.2 mg/m2/cycle and 1.8 mg/m2/cycle were 25.8% and 16.7%, respectively.

Key learning: This analysis supports the current FDA-approved dose for InO monotherapy of 1.8 mg/m2/cycle as providing a favorable balance of safety and efficacy, although dosing may be individualized according to treatment setting and transplant-related VOD/SOS risk.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content