All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

The ALL Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your ALL Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2023-02-06T11:31:13.000Z

Novel treatment approaches in Ph+ ALL: Key updates from ASH 2022

Feb 6, 2023
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Bookmark this article

BCR-ABL is a key biomarker of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a subtype that most commonly occurs in adult patients. Historically, Ph+ ALL has been associated with poor prognosis; however, the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the treatment landscape for this patient subset. Third-generation BCR-ABL TKIs have exhibited potent activity; as illustrated by ponatinib’s activity against the 944C→T (Thr315Ile) mutation, which is implicated in treatment resistance and relapse,1,2 and olverembatinib’s promising activity in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Ph+ ALL.3

In this article, we summarize five key trials of TKI-based regimens for adult patients with Ph+ ALL, presented at the 64th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition.

Olverembatinib in patients with heavily pretreated/refractory chronic myeloid leukemia and Ph+ ALL3

Results from a U.S. based phase Ib study (NCT04260022) of olverembatinib in patients with CML and Ph+ ALL who experienced resistance or intolerance to at least two prior TKIs, including ponatinib, was presented by Elias Jabbour.3 This study was conducted based on the demonstrated activity of olverembatinib in patients with CML within China. The primary endpoint was pharmacokinetics and secondary endpoints were efficacy and safety.

Results

Overall, 51 patients were enrolled including 38 with CML-chronic phase (CP) and 13 with advanced stage Ph+ leukemia (blast phase (BP), accelerated-phase, and Ph+ ALL). Prior ponatinib therapy did not yield a response in 28 patients, due to resistance and intolerance in 21 and 7 patients, respectively; 19 of patients harbored the T315L mutation.

Pharmacokinetic profile

Olverembatinib exhibited dose proportionality, with an approximate increase in its systemic plasma exposure from 30 mg to 50 mg every other day. The maximum concentration range was 14.8–32.9 ng/ML, median Tmax was 4–6 hours, and half-life was 17.7–20.9 hours. No significant drug accumulation occurred even after multiple administrations. This pharmacokinetics data is comparable to historical controls from the Chinese-based study.

Efficacy

Overall, olverembatinib achieved efficacious responses in evaluable CML-CP patients (n = 23) across dose, mutation status, and in those who failed ponatinib; response was also observed within the evaluable advanced Ph+ leukemia cohort (n = 7; Figure 1).

Figure 1. Response rates in patients with CML and Ph+ ALL*  

CCyR, complete cytogenetic response CML-BP, chronic myeloid leukemia-blast phase; MMR, major molecular response; Ph+, philadelphia chromosome-positive.
*Adapted from Jabbour.3
n = 14/18 for CCyR; n = 10/23 for MMR.
n = 10/12 for CCyR; n = 6/14 for MMR.
§
Mutated (n = 7/8 for CCyR; n = 5/9 for MMR) and non-mutated (n = 10/12 for CCyR and n = 6/14).
**n = 2/7 for both CCyR and MMR.

  • Both responders (one with Ph+ ALL and one with accelerated-phase CML) in the advanced Ph+ group did not harbor the T315l mutation and were resistant to prior ponatinib treatment.
  • At a median follow-up of 9 months, a complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response was achieved within 14 and 24 weeks in the CML-BP group and within 1.5 months and 24 weeks in the advanced Ph+ leukemia group, respectively.

Safety

The incidence of hematological toxicities (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and leukopenia) was lower compared with the study from China. Other treatment-related adverse events (AEs) include increased blood creatinine phosphokinase (during Cycle 1; 35%), increased aminotransferases (24%), increased lipases (19%), and fatigue (26%). Serious AEs were reported in six patients, none of which resulted in treatment discontinuation.

Presenter’s conclusion

Olverembatinib showed promising results in patients with CML-CP and advanced Ph+ ALL following treatment with ponatinib, including those with or without T1315l mutations.

Ponatinib plus blinatumomab in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL4

Data from the phase II substudy analysis of ponatinib plus blinatumomab in newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL (NCT03263572) were presented by Short. The primary endpoint was complete molecular response (CMR) rate, secondary endpoints were event-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

Results

Baseline characteristics have been previously reported on the ALL Hub. Of the 60 patients enrolled, 40 had newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL; 60% had ≥1 cardiovascular-related risk factors and median CD19 expression was 99.8%.

Response rates and survival rates were evident in the evaluable cohort at the median follow-up of 18 months (Table 1). During Cycle 1, 58% had achieved a complete response (CR) in the peripheral blood with a rapid reduction of the BCR/AB1 transcript after 2 weeks of treatment.

Table 1. Response and survival rates*

Response, % (unless otherwise stated)

Newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL (n = 40)

Hematologic responses

 

               ORR

96

               CR

93

               CRi

4

               Early death

3

Complete molecular response

 

               Overall

87

               After cycle one

68

NGS MRD negative

88

Survival analysis

 

               2-year EFS

92

               2-year OS

95

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CR, complete response, CRi, complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery; EFS, event-free survival; MRD, minimal residual disease; NGS, next-generation sequencing; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; Ph, Philadelphia-chromosome.
*Data from Short.4
12 patients in the newly diagnosed group were excluded due to complete response at the start of therapy.
Two patients were excluded due to complete molecular response at the start of therapy.

Among the newly diagnosed cohort, there was one death in CR, one early death, and two relapses; one patient received hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in CR1 and the remaining patients are in ongoing remission without HSCT.

Safety

There were no Grade 4 or higher treatment-related AEs reported. Ponatinib plus blinatumomab-related Grade 3 AEs included increased ALT, in four patients; pancreatitis, in two; and rash, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, febrile neutropenia, and coronary artery stenosis in one patient each. Discontinuations due to AEs occurred in three patients.

Presenter’s conclusion

Ponatinib plus blinatumomab proved to be efficacious and safe in newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL, with deep, early, and durable responses observed without the need for HSCT. Follow-up analyses are necessary to further evaluate the risk of late relapses.

Hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL: 6-year follow-up results5

The 6-year follow-up results of hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL (NCT01424982),recently published in American Journal of Hematology,6 were presented by Nasnas.  The study endpoints included efficacy (CR, cytogenetics and molecular); CR duration; survival outcomes; and safety.

Results

Among the 86 patients who were enrolled and treated, 66 were previously untreated and 20 were previously treated; of these 20 patients, there were two non-responders and 18 in CR. CR was achieved within four weeks of treatment (Table 2).

Table 2. Response rates in evaluable patients*

Response, % (unless otherwise stated)

Patients with Ph+ ALL (n = 68)

               CR

100

               CCyR

100

               Early death

0

Molecular response

 

               MMR

98

                              After induction

68

               CMR

86

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CcyR, complete cytogenetic response; CR, complete response; CMR, complete molecular response; MMR, major molecular response; Ph+, Philadelphia-chromosome positive.
*Data from Nasnas, et al.5
18 patients were in CR at the start of therapy.
28 patients were diploid by cytogenetics at the start of therapy.

Safety

The most common Grade 3 AEs reported in >15% of patients were infections (93%), increased ALT and AST (31%), hypertension (17%), increased amylase and lipase (16%), pancreatitis (15%), and increased bilirubin (15%).

Presenter’s conclusion

Hyper CVAD plus ponatinib proved highly effective as a frontline combination in patients with Ph+ ALL. This regimen was deemed safe in this patient subset, even more so with risk-adapted dosing of ponatinib. Current investigations into chemotherapy-free options for this patient population are ongoing.

Olverembatinib in adult patients with Ph/BCR-ABL1+ ALL with T315I mutation and relapsed disease7

The first data on olverembatinib in adult patients with Ph/BCR BCR-ABL1+, who either harbored the T315I mutation or experienced disease progression, within China was presented by Weiyang Liu. The study endpoints were efficacy (CR, MRD negativity by MFC and CMR) and safety.

Results

Efficacy

In total, 10 patients were treated. Five patients received 2 or more prior TKI’s, two of whom relapsed following ponatinib. With a median follow-up of 3 months, ORR was achieved in 70% of the patients, with an MRD and CMR rate of 71.4% and 57.1%, respectively.

  • Of the six patients with a detected T315l mutation still in CR1, 66.7% achieved CMR
  • The remaining four patients who were in hematologic relapse achieved a 75% CR rate; one of the two patients with T315L mutation did not respond and the other achieved MRD-negativity
  • Olverembatinib was effective in patients who were previously treated with ponatinib

Safety

The incidence of common AEs (cytopenia, elevated transaminases, hypertension, and cardiovascular events) related to third-generation TKIs less frequently occurred in olverembatinib compared with ponatinib. Grade 1 skin pigmentation was observed in four patients, with no drug-related deaths or discontinuations reported.

Presenter’s conclusion

Overall olverembatinib shown encouraging efficacy and safety in adult patients with Ph/BCR BCR-ABL1+ with T315l mutations or relapsed disease.

Ponatinib plus blinatumomab for patients with R/R Ph+ ALL or CML: a phase II subgroup analysis8

Results from the phase II substudy analysis of ponatinib plus blinatumomab in patients with R/R Ph+ ALL and CML in lymphoid blast phase (CML-BP) (NCT03263572) was presented by Macaron.

Results

Efficacy

In total, 20 patients were treated the R/R Ph+ ALL cohort (n = 14) and CML-BP cohort (n = 6). The response and survival rates for the R/R and CML-LBP cohort are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Response rates*

Response, % (unless otherwise
stated)

R/R Ph+ ALL
(n = 14)

CML-LBP
(n = 6)

Hematologic responses

 

 

               ORR

92

83

               CR

85

67

               CRi

8

17

CMR

79

33

Survival analysis

 

 

               2-year EFS

46

33

               2-year OS

59

60

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CML-LBP, chronic myeloid leukemia-lymphoid blast phase; CMR, complete molecular response; CR, complete response; CRi, complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery; EFS, event-free survival; MMR, major molecular response; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; Ph+, Philadelphia-chromosome positive.
*Data from Macaron.7
One patient in the R/R group were in CR at the start of therapy but still had positive BCR/ABL1.

At a median follow-up of 22 months in the R/R cohort, six patients underwent HSCT out of 13 responders and four patients relapsed; there was one death in CR and two patients are in ongoing remission. Moreover, for the CML-BP cohort, three patients experienced relapsed disease and subsequently died out of 5 responders, with two patients still in ongoing remission.

Presenter’s conclusion

Ponatinib and blinatumomab showed promising efficacy and safety in patients with both R/R Ph+ ALL and CML-BP. This combination regimen achieved high rates of deep molecular responses in patients with R/R Ph+ ALL. Conversely, the lower rates of molecular responses seen in patients with CML-BP suggest that alternative approaches should be considered for this subgroup of patients.

  1. Saleh K, Fernandez A, and Pasquier F. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic Leukemia in adults. Cancers (Basel). 2022. 14(7):1805. DOI:10.3390/cancers14071805
  2. Jabbour E, Short N, Jain N, et al. Ponatinib and blinatumomab for Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a US, single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Hematol. 2022. Online ahead of print. DOI: 1016/S2352-3026(22)00319-2
  3. Jabbour E. Olverembatinib (HQP1351) overcomes ponatinib resistance in patients with heavily pretreated/refractory chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Oral abstract session #82. 64th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec 10, 2022; New Orleans, US.
  4. Short N. Ponatinib and blinatumomab for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a subgroup analysis from a phase II study. Oral abstract #213. 64th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec 10, 2022; New Orleans, US.
  5. Nasnas P. Frontline combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia—6-year follow-up results. Poster presentation #1410. 64th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec 10, 2022; New Orleans, US.
  6. Kantarjian H, Short NJ, Jain N, et al. Frontline combination of ponatinib and hyper-CVAD in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 80-months follow-up results. Am J Hematol. 2023. Online ahead of print. DOI: 1002/ajh.26816
  7. Liu W. The first report of third-generation TKI olverembatinib in adult Ph/BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia with T315I mutation and relapsed disease. Poster presentation #1417. 64th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec 10, 2022; New Orleans, US.
  8. Macaron W. Ponatinib and blinatumomab for patients with relapsed/refractory philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast phase: a subgroup analysis from a phase II study. Poster presentation #4046. 64th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec 12, 2022; New Orleans, US.

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the ALL Hub?
1 vote - 81 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to ALL delivered to your inbox