All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen and Autolus. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Predictors of survival in adults with R/R B-ALL treated with blinatumomab and/or inotuzumab ozogamicin

By Megan Moore

Share:

Jan 1, 1970

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in B-cell ALL.


Results from a retrospective, single-center study evaluating predictors of survival in 172 adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) following first salvage therapy with blinatumomab and/or inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) were published in Leukemia by Azevedo et al. 

Key data: In multivariate analysis, early relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–3.96; p = 0.007) and measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) after Cycle 1 of salvage therapy (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.75–5.33; p < 0.001) were independently associated with inferior relapse-free survival (RFS). Early relapse (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.28–4.16; p = 0.005), MFC MRD positivity (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.28–3.81; p = 0.004), and older age (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00–1.04, p = 0.02) were associated with worse overall survival (OS) outcomes. Patients with MRD negativity after Cycle 1 and either late relapse or primary refractory disease had a 4-year RFS of 54% and a 4-year OS of 66% and were subsequently classified as “lower-risk”. In contrast, patients with MRD positivity after Cycle 1 and/or early relapse had a 4-year RFS of 26% and 4-year OS of 33% and were classified as “higher-risk”. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) improved RFS among higher-risk patients (4-year RFS, 56% vs 22%; p = 0.03) but not lower-risk patients (4-year RFS, 60% vs 63%; p = 0.82) compared with those who did not receive allo-HSCT. 

Key learning: In this study, MFC MRD status after Cycle 1 of salvage therapy and time to relapse were identified as determinants of OS and RFS in patients with R/R B-ALL, supporting their potential use for risk stratification and identification of patients who may have different outcomes with or without consolidative allo-HSCT. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content