All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

The ALL Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your ALL Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2020-09-21T10:40:19.000Z

Results from the AALL0434 phase III trial evaluating nelarabine in newly diagnosed pediatric and young adult T-ALL

Sep 21, 2020
Share:

Bookmark this article

Chemotherapy with nelarabine, a DNA-terminating nucleoside, has been successful in producing partial and complete remission in patients with relapsed and refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL).1 Nevertheless, its efficacy in newly diagnosed T-ALL has not been fully evaluated. So far, preliminary results from the AALL00P2 pilot study have shown that nelarabine addition to chemotherapy backbone was safe and led to a 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of 73% in patients with high-risk newly diagnosed pediatric T-ALL.

Therefore, Dunsmore et al.1 investigated the efficacy and safety of nelarabine in children and young adults with newly diagnosed T-ALL during the phase III randomized AALL0434 trial (NCT00408005). The results of the study were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology and are summarized below.

Study design

  • Randomized, phase III trial that enrolled 1,596 patients aged 131 with newly diagnosed, untreated (except corticosteroids) T-ALL. All patients participated in a 28-day, prednisone-based, four-drug induction. Following induction, patients underwent risk stratification, and high-risk (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) patients were included in the efficacy phase, while only HR patients were included in the safety phase.
  • In total, 659 HR or IR patients were randomized to receive six 5-day courses of 650 mg/m2/d of nelarabine or not, together with backbone chemotherapy (either pegaspargase + methotrexate [C-MTX] or high-dose methotrexate [HDMTX]):
    • Consolidation phase: Two nelarabine courses on Days 1-5 and Days 43-47.
    • Delayed intensification phase: One nelarabine course on Days 29-33.
    • Maintenance phase: Three nelarabine courses on Days 29-33 of the first three maintenance cycles.
    • All IR and HR patients received prophylactic cranial radiation therapy (12 Gy).

Results

  • No differences in baseline characteristics were detected between the nelarabine and no nelarabine arms, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Patient characteristics from the phase III AALL0434 trial1

Allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; BM, bone marrow; CNS, central nervous system; MRD, measurable residual disease; WBC, white blood cells.

*CNS1, total nucleated cells < 5/HPF with no blasts; CNS2, total nucleated cells < 5/HPF with blasts identified by light microscopy; CN3, total nucleated cells ≥ 5/HPF with blasts identified.

M1, < 5% blasts; M2, 6%–25% blasts.

Characteristic, n (%)

Nelarabine

(n = 323)

No nelarabine

(n = 336)

Age, years

 

 

       < 10

151 (46.8)

178 (53.0)

       10-15

116 (35.9)

104 (30.9)

       ≥ 16

56 (17.3)

54 (16.1)

Sex

 

 

    Male

238 (73.7)

255 (75.9)

    Female

85 (26.3)

81 (24.1)

WBC (× 1,000/µL)

 

 

    < 50

130 (40.3)

116 (34.5)

    ≥ 50

193 (59.7)

220 (65.5)

CNS involvement*

 

 

    CNS1

232 (71.8)

233 (69.4)

    CNS2

62 (19.2)

75 (22.3)

    CNS3

29 (9.0)

28 (8.3)

Allo-HSCT

 

 

    Yes

8 (2.5)

13 (3.9)

    No

275 (85.1)

274 (81.5)

    Unknown

40 (12.4)

49 (14.6)

BM involvement, induction Day 29

 

 

    M1

306 (94.7)

322 (95.8)

    M2

17 (5.3)

14 (4.2)

MRD status, induction Day 29, %

 

 

    > 0.01

160 (49.5)

174 (51.8)

    0.01% to < 0.1

16 (5.0)

14 (4.2)

    0.1% to < 1.0

38 (11.7)

32 (9.5)

    1.0% to <10.0

91 (28.2)

86 (25.6)

    ≥ 10

18 (5.6)

30 (8.9)

  • The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival for patients receiving ± nelarabine and by arm are shown below in Table 2. Notably, patients receiving nelarabine had greater 5-year DFS but unchanged 5-year overall survival when compared with those without nelarabine treatment. When comparing arms, C-MTX + nelarabine had the best 5-year DFS rate, followed by C-MTX without nelarabine, then HDMTX + nelarabine, and lastly the HDMTX arm (p = 0.01).
  • Among 323 patients who received nelarabine, 39 patients had an event, whereas 58 out of 336 patients treated without nelarabine had an event. The most common event was relapse (72.2%). Nelarabine addition to backbone chemotherapy was associated with a decrease in central nervous system relapses (p = 0.0001).

Table 2. Outcomes for patients receiving ± nelarabine and by arm in the phase III AALL0434 trial1

C-MTX, escalating-dose methotrexate without leucovorin rescue + pegaspargase; DFS, disease-free survival; HDMTX, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue; nel, nelarabine; OS, overall survival.

*Statistical significance is indicated by bold font.

Outcome, %

Nelarabine

(n = 323)

No nelarabine

(n = 336)

p value*

5-year DFS

88.2%

82.1%

0.029

5-year OS

90.3%

87.9%

0.168

Outcome per arm, %

Arm A
(C-MTX)
(n = 151)

Arm B
(C-MTX + nel)
(n = 147)

Arm C
(HDMTX)
(n = 185)

Arm D
(HDMTX + nel)
(n = 176)

p value*

5-year DFS

87.2%

91.4%

78.1%

85.5%

0.01

  • Twenty-three out of 917 patients (2.5%) were taken off protocol to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Multivariable Cox regression analysis on this group revealed worse DFS for those who underwent allo-HSCT compared with those receiving protocol chemotherapy, irrespective of their early T-cell precursor status. These results are shown below in Table 3.

Table 3. Multivariable cox regression analyses from the phase III AALL0434 trial1

allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CI, confidence interval; DFS, disease-free survival; EFS, event-free survival; ETP, early T-cell precursor; HR, high risk; IR, intermediate risk.

*The use of allo-HSCT was not a predefined study question, and results were assessed using a retrospective survey design.

Statistical significance is indicated by bold font.

Comparison group*

Outcome

Covariates included

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

p value

Randomized cohort ± nelarabine

(n = 570)

DFS

Treatment arm (nelarabine vs no nelarabine), risk group (IR vs HR), allo-HSCT vs chemotherapy

3.32 (1.34-8.23)

0.009

Overall cohort with available ETP and allo-HSCT status

(n = 813)

DFS

ETP status (ETP or near ETP vs no ETP), allo-HSCT vs chemotherapy

5.86 (2.50-13.75)

< 0.0001

Induction failure

(n = 43)

EFS

Allo-HSCT vs chemotherapy

0.66 (0.24-1.83)

0.423

  • In terms of safety, the rate of overall Grade ³ 3 adverse events were similar between the nelarabine (41.2%) and no nelarabine arms (46.1%) (p = 0.2). Similarly, the incidences of Grade 3-4 neuropathy (motor, p = 0.223; sensory, p = 0.664) and Grade ³ 3 central neurotoxicities (p = 0.298) were not significantly different between the two groups.
  • Two patients with induction failure who were assigned to nelarabine (non-randomly) developed signs of central neurocognitive decompensation and died.

Conclusion

The addition of nelarabine to backbone chemotherapy significantly increased the 5-year DFS rate for children and young adults with newly diagnosed T-ALL. More specifically, C-MTX together with nelarabine led to the best overall outcomes when compared with the other arms, which also applied to patients who terminated chemotherapy early to undergo allo-HSCT. Moreover, nelarabine addition to backbone chemotherapy was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of central nervous system relapses, and no unexpected toxicities were reported. These results indicate that nelarabine is an effective and safe treatment for children and young adults with newly diagnosed T-ALL.

  1. Dunsmore KP, Winter S, Devidas M, et al. Children’s Oncology Group AALL0434: A phase III randomized clinical trial testing nelarabine in newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Onc. 2020. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.00256

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to ALL delivered to your inbox