All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen and Autolus. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

GIMEMA ALL2820 phase III trial: Ponatinib + blinatumomab vs imatinib + chemotherapy in Ph+ ALL

By Megan Moore

Share:

Nov 13, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


Results from the randomized, phase III GIMEMA ALL2820 trial (NCT04722848) evaluating ponatinib + blinatumomab vs imatinib + chemotherapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Chiaretti et al. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS).

Key data: At a median follow-up of 23.7 months, the estimated 24-month EFS was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80–92) with ponatinib + blinatumomab (n = 158) vs 67% (95% CI, 56–79) with imatinib + chemotherapy (n = 78; p <0.001); estimated 24-month overall survival (OS) was 90% vs 85%, respectively, and the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 5% vs 13%, respectively. At the end of induction (Day 70), molecular response rates were 47% with ponatinib + blinatumomab vs 44% with imatinib + chemotherapy; following consolidation (Day 133), molecular response rates were 71% vs 49%, respectively. Grade ≥3 severe adverse events occurred in 34% vs 47% of patients, respectively.

Key learning: In GIMEMA ALL2820, ponatinib + blinatumomab demonstrated superior EFS vs imatinib + chemotherapy in adults with Ph+ ALL, supporting the potential of this chemotherapy-free approach as a first-line treatment option in this population; however, longer follow-up is needed. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.