The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View all content recommended for you
Blinatumomab, a bispecific CD3×CD19 T-cell engager, is an effective therapy for patients with B-ALL; however, the role of disease biology in relapse patterns remains unclear.1 A retrospective analysis of 267 adult patients with B-ALL treated at City of Hope who received ≥1 cycle of blinatumomab assessed the impact of patient and clinical factors and leukemia genetics.1 Results from this analysis were presented at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition by Aldoss.1 |
Key learnings |
Among R/R patients (n = 150), only pre-treatment high disease burden and EMD were associated with lower CR/CRi rates (47.3% with ≥50% BM blasts vs 80.4% with 5–49% BM blasts; p <0.01; and 13.3% vs 64.4% with vs without EMD; p <0.01) . |
Patients with TP53 mutations (13.1%) had an increased risk of CD19− relapse (HR, 6.84; 95% CI, 2.68–17.45; p <0.01), whilst patients who received allo-HSCT consolidation had a reduced risk of CD19− relapse (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03–0.37; p <0.01) and EMD relapse (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18–0.73; p <0.01). |
Patients with TP53 mutations had inferior LFS vs patients with no TP53 mutations (p = 0.0014), whilst patients who received blinatumomab and were MRD+ had improved LFS vs patients who were R/R, including in patients with TP53 mutations (p = 0.00032). |
Despite not impacting the initial response to blinatumomab, TP53 mutations may predict treatment failure after initial response, particularly CD19− relapse. These findings may impact on choice of CD19-directed immunotherapy for TP53 mutated B-ALL. |
Abbreviations: allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ASH, American Society of Hematology; B-ALL, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; BM, bone marrow; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete remission; CRi, CR with incomplete count recovery; EMD, extramedullary disease; HR, hazard ratio; LFS, leukemia-free survival; MRD, measurable residual disease; R/R, relapsed/refractory.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content