All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

PhALLCON: Impact of MRD negativity post induction with ponatinib vs imatinib in newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL

By Abhilasha Verma

Share:

Jun 5, 2025


 

Ponatinib, a third-generation BCR::ABL1TKI, was approved by the FDA for the treatment of ND Ph+ ALL based on results from the PhALLCON trial (NCT03589326).1 The ALL Hub previously reported the results from this trial. PhALLCON is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ponatinib vs imatinib combined with RIC in adults with ND Ph+ ALL. Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to receive ponatinib (n = 164) or imatinib (n = 81) in combination with RIC. 

A post hoc analysis from this trial evaluating the outcomes of ponatinib vs imatinib in patients who did not achieve MRD negativity by EOI was presented by Aldoss at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.1 This analysis included 113 patients who did not achieve MRD negativity (≤0.01% or better) by EOI and continued treatment. Outcomes included molecular response rates, RFS, OS, PFS, and safety.1

 

Key learnings 

A higher MRD negativity (≤0.01% or better) was achieved at all time points with ponatinib vs imatinib 38% vs 28% (EOC9), 41% vs 30% (EOC20), and 48% vs 33% (EOT).

In the ponatinib vs imatinib arms, median DoR was NR vs 3.8 months, 2-year EFS was 87% vs 62%, 2-year OS was 91.3% vs 87.3%, median PFS was 8.5 months vs 7.3 months, and 2-year PFS was 36.3% vs 12.7%.

TEAEs in ponatinib vs imatinib arms were 100% vs 98% (Grade ≥3: 91% vs 94%); dose modification due to TEAEs was 71% vs 54% (discontinuation: 15% vs 9%; reduction: 16% vs 28%; interruption: 66% vs 41%).

These data strengthen the effectiveness and tolerability findings from the PhALLCON trial and support the use of ponatinib in combination with RIC for patients with ND Ph+ ALL without MRD negativity by EOI.

Abbreviations: DoR, duration of response; EFS, event-free survival; EOC, end of cycle; EOI, end of induction; EOT, end of treatment; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; MRD, measurable residual disease; ND Ph+ ALL, newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; RIC, reduced-intensity chemotherapy; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia do you see in a year?