All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.
The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen and Autolus. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View ALL content recommended for you
An American Society of Hematology (ASH) study describing outcome prioritization for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was published in Blood Neoplasia by Saldanha et al. Two multidisciplinary guideline panels (N = 46) prioritized outcomes for 32 research questions covering first-line management, relapsed/refractory disease, or both using a three-step process. The objectives were to describe the outcome selection process, summarize prioritized outcomes, and assess how frequently those outcomes were reported in existing studies of AYAs with ALL.
Key data: Across 32 research questions, 34 unique outcomes were prioritized (median, 7 per question), spanning mortality/survival, physiological/clinical, functional, resource use, and adverse effect core areas. The most common outcomes were overall survival (OS; 84% of questions), relapse-/event-/disease-/progression-free survival or relapse (RFS/EFS/DFS/PFS/relapse; 84%), and quality of life (QoL; 81%). Short- and long-term toxicity, measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative status, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and hospital admission were prioritized for 75%, 53%, 31%, and 31% of questions, respectively. Across 16 systematic reviews, each prioritized outcome was reported by a median of 25% of included studies. OS was the most frequently reported prioritized outcome (median, 79%), followed by RFS/EFS/DFS/PFS/relapse (median, 64%) and short- and long-term toxicity (median, 60%). Fertility (0 studies) and QoL (median, 0%; range, 0–6) were the least frequently reported prioritized outcomes.
Key learning: These findings highlight a gap between stakeholder-prioritized outcomes and current reporting practices in AYA ALL research, supporting the development and adoption of a core outcome set.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content