TRANSLATE

The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Safety of low-dose inotuzumab ozogamicin posttransplant in B-ALL: Phase I trial

By Quintina Dawson

Share:

Mar 5, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in ALL


Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a curative option for adult and pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapse rates of 20−50% are still seen post-allo-HSCT, after which chemotherapeutic options are limited and the prognosis is poor.1

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a CD22-directed monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated significant activity in ALL. Here, we summarize results from a phase I multicenter study (NCT03104491) investigating the safety and feasibility of low-dose InO post-allo-HSCT in patients with high-risk B-cell ALL published by Metheny et al.1 in Blood Advances.

Study design1

  • Included patients aged 16−75 years diagnosed with CD22+ ALL who were in complete remission at Day 30 post-allo-HSCT, and had a high risk of relapse.
  • InO was given on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle at four dose levels: 0.3 mg/m2, 0.4 mg/m2, 0.5 mg/m2, and 0.6 mg/m2
  • The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of InO.
  • Secondary endpoints included safety, rate of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, non-relapse mortality, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates post-allo-HSCT, and measurable residual disease (MRD) status after InO.

Key findings1

Safety

  • A total of 19 patients were enrolled in the study between July 31, 2017, and October 18, 2021.
  • One dose-limiting toxicity was reported at the 0.5 mg/m2 dose level due to prolonged thrombocytopenia.
  • The maximum tolerated dose was 0.6 mg/m2
  • No cases of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome were reported.
  • The most common any-grade adverse events were thrombocytopenia (42%), neutropenia (32%), and nausea/vomiting (42%).

Survival and relapse

  • Among the entire cohort, the 1-year PFS was 89%.
  • There were two cases of relapse, one occurred seven months post-allo-HSCT and the other 23 months post-allo-HSCT.
  • Four out of six patients converted from MRD-positivity to MRD-negativity after treatment with InO.
  • The 1-year overall survival was 94%, and the 1-year non-relapse mortality was 5.6%.
  • Acute graft-versus-host disease was reported in 72.2% of patients.
  • New or chronic graft-versus-host disease was seen in 44.4%.
Key learnings
  • Low dose (up to 0.6 mg/m2) of InO posttransplant was well tolerated and feasible in patients with ALL at a high risk of relapse.
  • Low-dose InO posttransplant was also associated with high PFS rates and low relapse rates.
  • These data support the investigation of low-dose InO as maintenance therapy post-allo-HSCT in a phase II trial.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content