The Multiple Myeloma Hub previously summarised activities on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in China. Jianxiang Wang presented this topic at the 2nd European CAR T-cell Meeting, which has been summarised here. The article provided a summary of some of the investigational new drugs (IND) developed in China at the time.

At the 3rd European CAR T-cell Meeting, held virtually in February 2021, Jianxiang Wang presented information on the progression of CAR-T trials in China, specifically on reducing manufacturing times (FasTCAR) and incorporating a second target (dual CAR). He reported results from the trials evaluating the efficacy of GC022F and GC012F in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and multiple myeloma (MM), respectively.¹

Overview of clinical research with CAR T-cells in China

China is leading in CAR T-cell research with 265 ongoing clinical trials, mostly investigator-initiated studies, followed by 217 trials in the US
Thirteen industries are involved in a total of 21 IND trials, including five phase II trials
Of these five trials, three are in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), one in MM, and one in ALL
The indications for these trials included B-cell NHL (57%), myeloma (19%), leukemia (19%), and solid tumor (5%). Almost 74% of the trials were performed with cell therapy targeting CD19

Key advantages of FasT CAR T-cells²

FasTCAR^TM is a registered manufacturing platform that enables a concurrent activation and transduction of T cells with an optimized infection process that also avoids the need for ex vivo cell expansion. Altogether, it significantly shortens this part of the manufacturing process from 9−14 days to 22−36 hours
Preclinical studies with the FasTCAR technology have demonstrated that these CAR T-cells are superior in expansion and memory cell formation and reduce T-cell exhaustion, which ultimately could lead to more effective and durable treatments than the conventional CAR T-cell therapy
Reducing the timelines and processes could also help make these cutting-edge cell therapies a more affordable treatment option
FasTCAR products are being evaluated as therapeutic candidates for patients with MM, B-ALL, B-NHL, and solid tumors such as ovarian or breast cancer

GC022F – CD19/CD22 FasT dual CAR-T cell in R/R B-ALL

Study design

Results

The data cutoff date was November 4, 2020. The median follow-up was 126 days (range, 14−279 days). There was a transduction efficiency of 29.8% (17.0−60.1%) with the optimized manufacturing process and a 100% manufacture success rate.

Patient baseline characteristics

The median bone marrow (BM) blasts was 42% (range, 0−73%). See further details on baseline characteristics in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics*

Characteristic	n = 11
Gender (M/F)	6/5
Median age, years (range)	11 (3−48)
BM Blasts at enrollment
≥ 60%, n (%)	2 (18.2)
30−59%, n (%)	4 (36.4)
5−29%, n (%)	1 (9.1)
< 5%, n (%)	4 (36.4)
Relapsed after allo-HSCT, n	1
Previous CD19 CAR-T, n	3
Both CD19 CAR-T and allo-HSCT, n	1
allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; BM, bone marrow; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. *Data from Wang J. 2021¹

Efficacy

In four patients with BM blasts < 5%, three patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity on Day 28, except one, who showed a persistent MRD positivity on day 14
Of the seven patients with BM blasts > 5%, six achieved MRD negativity
Six MRD-negative patients followed allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT), and all maintained a MRD-negative complete response (CR) except one, who died of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and infection
Of the other three MRD-negative CR patients without allo-HSCT, one is still MRD negative at 4 months, another relapsed at 2.6 months, and the last one had MRD-positive recurrence at 4 months
All relapsed patients were CD19 and CD22 positive

Safety

The most common adverse events included leukopenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and fever. See Table 2 for further details.
The median time of onset for CRS was 6 days (range, 3−19 days), and the median duration was 8 days (range, 3−11). Only one patient (9%) developed Grade ≥ 3 CRS
Grade 1 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) was observed in only two (18%) patients

Table 2. Safety*

Adverse event (≥ 25% All Grade), n (%)	All patients (n = 11)
Adverse event (≥ 25% All Grade), n (%)	All Grades	Grade ≥ 3
Leukopenia	11 (100)	11 (100)
Lymphopenia	10 (91)	10 (91)
Thrombocytopenia	9 (82)	3 (27)
Anemia	9 (82)	4 (36)
Neutropenia	8 (73)	8 (73)
Fever	7 (64)	1 (9)
Hypocalcemia	4 (36)	0 (0)
Hypokalemia	4 (36)	0 (0)
Elevated ALT/AST	3 (27)/3 (27)	0 (0)
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase. *Data from Wang J. 2021¹

GC012F – BCMA/CD19 FasT dual CAR T-cell for R/R MM

Study design

Multicentre prospective, open-label study (NCT04236011) to determine the safety and efficacy of GC012F CAR T-cells in patients diagnosed with R/R MM and with B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expression
Patients received the following dose levels of GC012F in a single infusion. See Figure 1 for details

- Dose level 1: 1 × 10⁵ cells/kg
- Dose level 2: 2 × 10⁵ cells/kg
- Dose level 3: 3 × 10⁵ cells/kg

The primary endpoint is the incidence and severity of adverse events following GC012F infusion

Figure 1. Dose levels of GC012F*

C, cyclophosphamide; D, day; F, fludarabine; h, hours; QC, quality control.

*Adapted from Wang J. 2021¹

^†Lymphodepletion regime was 30 mg/m²/day fludarabine and 300 mg/m²/day cyclophosphamide for 3 days.

Results

Patient baseline characteristics

Fifteen (15/16) patients had a high-risk profile, and five (5/16) had ≥1 extramedullary plasmacytoma. See Table 3.
Enrolled patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 5 (2−9) prior regimens, and the vast majority (94%) were exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and anti-CD38 therapy.

Table 3. Patient baseline characteristics*

Characteristic	n = 16
Median age, years (range)	56 (27−71)
Male, n (%)	10 (63)
Type, n (%)
IgG	7 (44)
IgA	4 (25)
IgD	3 (19)
Light chain	2 (13)
Median years since diagnosis (range)	3 (1−10)
High-risk profile^†, n (%)	15 (94)
Double-hit^‡, n (%)	3 (19)
Extramedullary plasmacytomas ≥ 1, n (%)	5 (31)
Median prior regimens of therapy, n (range)	5 (2−9)
Median prior lines of therapy, n (range)	5 (2−7)
Prior auto-SCT, n (%)	4 (25)
Triple exposed^§,ǁ, n (%)	15 (94)
PI refractory	15 (94)
IMiD refractory	14 (88)
Anti-CD38 refractory	4 (25)
Penta exposed^ǁ, n (%)	10 (63)
Primary refractory, n (%)	3 (19)
Refractory to last therapy, n (%)	12 (75)
Auto-SCT, autologous hematopoietic stem-cell; IMiD, immunomodulatory drugs; PI, proteasome inhibitor. *Data from Wang J. 2021¹ ^†By mSMART 3.0. ^‡By presence of two del(17p), t(14;16), t(14,20), gain 1q, or p53 mutation. ^§PI, IMiD, and any other therapies including anti-CD38 antibody. ^ǁ≥1 PI (two PIs, ixazomib and bortezomib, were approved in China), ≥1 IMiDs (only lenalidomide is approved for MM in China), and ≥3 other antimyeloma drugs of any other class.

Efficacy

The median follow-up was 7.3 months (range, 1−10 months). Only one of the 16 patients enrolled did not achieve a response to treatment
ORR was achieved in 15 out of 16 patients (94%) with a very good partial response (VGPR) or better
CR or stringent CR (sCR) was achieved in nine out of 16 patients (56%)
Six patients out of six (100%) in Dose Level 3 achieved sCR
Median duration of response (DoR) has not been achieved yet
All evaluable patients were MRD negative at a minimum of 10^-4 sensitivity by next-generation flow at 3 months (n = 11) and 6 months (n = 10)

Safety

The most common adverse events (AEs) included lymphopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. See Table 4
Two patients (12%) experienced Grade 3 CRS. The remaining 14 patients (88%) showed Grade 1-2 CRS
None of the patients developed ICANS

Table 4. Safety*

Adverse event	All Grades, n (%)	Grade ≥3, n (%)
Hematologic TEAE (≥25% All grades)
Lymphopenia	13 (81)	13 (81)
Neutropenia	13 (81)	13 (81)
Leukopenia	11 (69)	11 (69)
Thrombocytopenia	11 (69)	11 (69)
Anemia	8 (50)	7 (44)
Hypoalbuminemia	8 (50)	0 (0)
Nonhematologic TEAE (≥25% All grades)
LDH increase	11 (69)	0 (0)
AST increase	7 (44)	5 (31)
Diarrhea	4 (25)	0 (0)
Lower respiratory tract infection	3 (19)	3 (19)
AST, aspartate aminotransferase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event. *Data from Wang J. 2021¹

Conclusion

The preclinical findings suggest that the FasTCAR platform can successfully manufacture the necessary product in 1 day with younger, less exhausted T cells and improved efficacy than conventional dual CAR-T cells.

Early clinical data for the CD19/CD22 FasT dual CAR T-cell GC022F, shows a favorable safety profile and good efficacy in treating R/R B-ALL patients.

Preliminary clinical data with the BCMA/CD19 FasT dual CAR T-cell GC012F, also showed a favorable safety profile, and promising efficacy in treating relapsed MM refractory compared with the currently available therapies.

Further studies with a larger sample size and longer-term follow-up are needed with both FasT dual CAR T-cell products.

[[references1]]

The ALL Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

B-cell, NOS

B-cell, NOS

All Types