All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

The ALL Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your ALL Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2024-03-26T17:31:32.000Z

“How I Treat”: Case studies on treatment approaches in children with ETP-ALL

Mar 26, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in ALL.

Bookmark this article

Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) is a novel subtype of immature T-cell ALL, representing 10−15% of cases, and is characterized by a lack of expression of CD1a and CD8, negative or weak expression of CD5, and expression of one or more myeloid and/or stem cell markers.1

Here, we summarize a “How I Treat” article, published by Summers et al.1 in Blood, discussing the treatment approaches and common clinical questions for children, adolescents, and young adults with ETP-ALL in three patient cases (Figure 1). The case studies cover the role of end-of-induction (EOI) minimal residual disease (MRD), choice of post-induction therapy, and the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission.

Figure 1. Case studies of children and adolescents with ETP-ALL*

ETP-ALL, early T-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
*Data from Summers, et al.1

Case 1: Newly diagnosed ETP-ALL with induction failure and MRD negativity at the end of consolidation1

Treatment and outcome

  • Patient received the following treatment:
    • prednisone-based induction as per arm B of COG AALL0434 trial (NCT00408005);
    • an augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) consolidation with nelarabine;
    • a single interim maintenance phase with escalating doses of methotrexate plus pegaspargase; and
    • 1,200 centigray of cranial radiotherapy (CRT).
  • At the EOI, bone marrow showed induction failure, with 62% T-lymphoblasts.
  • By mid-consolidation, bone marrow was MRD negative (<0.01%).
  • Patient remains in remission at 5 years posttreatment.

Recommendations

  • Preclinical data has shown that ETP-ALL is more intrinsically glucocorticoid-resistant than mature T-ALL; therefore, dexamethasone-based induction is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed ETP-ALL
  • In AALL0434, nelarabine led to a significant reduction in central nervous system (CNS) relapse and was well tolerated; therefore, it is recommended for the treatment of ETP-ALL (Figure 2).
  • Comparable survival outcomes were reported in patients treated with vs without CRT and by CNS status in AAALL0434 and AALL1231, respectively.
    • CRT is only recommended for patients with CNS3 and omission should be considered for patients aged <5 years or those with additional risk factors.

Case 2: Refractory ETP-ALL1

Treatment and outcome

  • Received dexamethasone-based induction, after which EOI MRD was 4.3%
  • Augmented BFM consolidation incorporating nelarabine, after which MRD was 0.5%
  • Received one high-risk block of BFM, and then became MRD negative
  • Patient underwent allo-HSCT and remains disease-free 4 years later

Recommendations

  • Immunophenotyping alone is not adequate to identify patients with immature, treatment-resistant T-ALL
  • Specific genomic factors could be used alongside MRD for risk stratification
  • HSCT is recommended in patients with end of consolidation flow-based MRD 0.01−0.1% who do not achieve MRD (Figure 2).

Case 3: Relapsed ETP-ALL1

Treatment approach and outcome

  • Received daratumumab plus vincristine, prednisone, and calaspargase to achieve CR with an MRD of 1.2%
  • Subsequently, received consolidation therapy with daratumumab plus methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and 6-mercaptopurine to achieve MRD negativity.
  • Experienced isolated bone marrow relapse 6 months post-HSCT
  • Enrolled in a phase I trial of allogeneic CD7-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and remains in remission 9 months after treatment

Recommendations

  • Based on the survival rate post relapse of <35%, allo-HSCT is recommended in patients with relapsed ETP-ALL after achieving second complete remission (Figure 2).
  • Comprehensive genomic profiling to identify biomarkers and enrollment in clinical trials are encouraged for patients with relapsed ETP-ALL (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Recommended treatment approach for A newly diagnosed and B relapsed ETP-ALL*


aBFM, augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster; ETP-ALL, early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CMTX, Capizzi methotrexate; CR2, second complete remission; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; MRD, minimal residual disease.
*Data from Summers, et al.1

Continued chemotherapy or HSCT is a feasible option for these patients.

 

Key learnings
  • Treatment approaches for patients with ETP-ALL and near-ETP ALL should be same as patients with non-ETP ALL.
  • Dexamethasone is the recommended treatment for induction and post-induction therapy, with the incorporation of nelarabine.
  • CRT should only be used for patients with CNS3 disease and omitted in those with high-risk features and aged <5 years.
  • HSCT is recommended for patients with poor end of consolidation MRD response (0.01−0.1%).
  • Novel therapies or clinical trial enrollment should be encouraged in children with relapsed/refractory T-cell ALL.

  1. Summers RJ, Teachey DT, Hunger SP. How I treat early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) in children. Blood. 2024. Online ahead of print. DOI: 1182/blood.2023023155

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to ALL delivered to your inbox