All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.
The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen and Autolus. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View ALL content recommended for you
Results from a prospective, randomized trial evaluating prophylactic (n = 37) vs preemptive, measurable residual disease (MRD)-triggered imatinib (n = 38) maintenance following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were published in Leukemia & Lymphoma by Pfeifer et al. The primary endpoint was molecular or hematologic relapse.
Key data: At 8 years, no significant differences were observed between the prophylactic imatinib group and the MRD-triggered imatinib group for cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 14.5% vs 19.1%), leukemia-free survival (LFS; 63.7% vs 69.3%), overall survival (OS; 68.3% vs 70.9%), and non-relapse mortality (NRM; 7.9% vs 7.7%). Pre-transplant MRD levels ≥10−3 were predictive of higher CIR (47.5% vs 26.5%) and inferior LFS (45.0% vs 59.8%) compared with MRD levels above 10−4. Imatinib was well tolerated; the most common Grade 3/4 severe adverse events (SAEs) were gastrointestinal and pancytopenia, which were reported in nine and four patients, respectively. No imatinib-related deaths occurred.
Key learning: Prophylactic and MRD-triggered imatinib maintenance demonstrated equivalent long-term outcomes, supporting the use of either strategy in patients with Ph+ ALL after HSCT. Further investigation is required to determine the value of MRD levels in identifying patients at higher risk of relapse.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content