All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen and Autolus. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Second-line therapy outcomes in Ph+ ALL: A retrospective analysis

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Sep 4, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


Results from a retrospective analysis of second-line therapy outcomes in 165 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated in first salvage at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1992 and 2025 were published in Cancer by Kantarjian et al. Outcomes included response rates and survival.

Key data: The overall complete remission (CR) rate was 80%. Salvage therapy with imatinib (odds ratio [OR], 37.7; p = 0.0003), second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; OR, 30.9; p < 0.0001), and third-generation TKIs (OR, 25.7; p < 0.0001) were associated with higher CR rates vs no TKI. Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was an independent predictor of a lower CR rate on multivariate analysis (OR, 0.21; p = 0.0188). The median overall survival (OS) was 15 months, with a 3-year OS rate of 31%. The 3-year OS rate was 57% with third-generation TKI combinations, 38% with second-generation TKI combinations, 8% with imatinib combinations, and 0% without TKIs. By multivariate analysis, imatinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; p = 0.0457), second-generation TKI (HR, 0.29; p < 0.0001), ponatinib (HR, 0.20; p < 0.0001), blinatumomab-based therapy (HR, 0.36; p = 0.0058), and white blood cell count (WBC) ≥50 × 10⁹/L (HR, 1.96; p = 0.0076) were independently predictive of survival.

Key learning: The incorporation of TKIs, particularly third-generation TKI combinations, into clinical practice has enabled substantially improved outcomes in first salvage Ph+ ALL, supporting the use of modern combination therapies in this population.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content