All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen, Autolus, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

PCR vs NGS MRD discordance in Ph-positive ALL: A retrospective analysis

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Jan 14, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute lymphocytic leukemia.


During the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 6–9, 2025, Orlando, US, Nicholas Short presented results from a retrospective analysis investigating discordance between minimal residual disease (MRD) status based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) for immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (IG/TR) vs polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for BCR::ABL1 in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL)

Key data: Among 187 patients with ≥1 sample with NGS MRD negativity and paired PCR for BCR::ABL1, 23% demonstrated NGS-negative/PCR-positive MRD discordance. Discordance occurred in 27% and 18% of patients with p190 and p210 transcript types, respectively, with PCR >0.1% and >1% occurring only in p190. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation in two discordant patients resulted in rapid PCR increases from 0.3% to 17.7% and from 0.03% to 28.9%. Among 80 newly diagnosed patients, those with NGS-negative/PCR-negative vs NGS-negative/PCR-positive status showed similar 3-year outcomes: relapse-free survival (RFS; 76% vs 69%; p = 0.76) and overall survival (OS; 89% vs 89%; p = 0.89).

Key learning: In patients with Ph+ ALL who achieve NGS MRD negativity, detectable PCR for BCR::ABL1 does not impact relapse or survival outcomes, regardless of PCR value. Indefinite TKI therapy may be appropriate in patients with persistent PCR for BCR::ABL1.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Based on emerging data, which induction approach do you believe has the greatest potential to improve outcomes in adults with newly diagnosed Ph− B-ALL?