All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.
The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen, Autolus, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View ALL content recommended for you
A systematic review, evaluating pediatric-inspired regimens and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), was published in Blood Advances by Sereda et al. This review aimed to provide a focused analysis of pediatric-inspired regimens vs conventional, asparaginase-free adult regimens in AYA patients with ALL who were receiving first-line therapy and to compare HSCT vs no HSCT in AYA patients with ALL who were in first complete remission (CR). The meta-analyses included 19 studies comparing regimens (N = 3,607) and seven studies comparing HSCT to no HSCT (N = 7,492).
Key data: Meta-analyses of overall survival (OS) favored pediatric-inspired regimens, with a pooled relative risk (RR) at 5 years of 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–1.65; six studies). Event-free survival (EFS) was generally higher with pediatric regimens vs adult regimens, with a pooled EFS RR at 5 years of 1.80 (95% CI, 1.13–2.85; five studies). There was no significant difference in CR rates in pediatric vs adult regimens. Most studies did not compare safety between pediatric and adult regimens. OS following HSCT varied between studies, while disease-free survival (DFS) was found to be lower with HSCT vs without HSCT. Findings regarding relapse following HSCT were inconsistent across studies and time points.
Key learning: Findings from this review suggest that pediatric-inspired regimens may result in improved survival outcomes vs adult regimens, while HSCT may lead to inferior overall survival and DFS in AYA patients with ALL. Comparative safety outcomes were rarely reported, precluding conclusions on safety outcomes. Further studies are warranted to confirm and expand these findings in specific ALL subgroups.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content