All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.
The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen, Autolus, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View ALL content recommended for you
Results from a retrospective analysis, evaluating risk and outcomes of central nervous system (CNS) relapse in 748 adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), were published in Bone Marrow Transplantation by Lee et al. The aim of this analysis was to assess incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, to identify characteristics associated with CNS relapse, and to evaluate outcomes with different prophylactic and therapeutic interventions.
Key data: CNS relapse was associated with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive vs Ph-negative ALL (9.5% vs 1.2%; p < 0.001) and high vs normal white blood cell (WBC) counts at diagnosis (8.1% vs 2.5%; p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was longer in patients with CNS relapse vs relapse without CNS involvement (15.5 vs 8.6 months; p = 0.008). In Ph‑positive ALL with isolated CNS relapse, ponatinib-based therapy demonstrated a higher 5‑year OS rate vs dasatinib-based therapy (83.3% vs 21.2%; p = 0.011). Poor molecular response (PMR) pre‑allo‑HSCT (p < 0.001) and prophylactic radiation therapy (RT), used when intrathecal chemotherapy was not feasible (p < 0.001), were associated with higher incidence of CNS relapses in Ph‑positive and Ph‑negative ALL, respectively. Conversely, negative measurable residual disease (MRD) pre-transplant in Ph‑positive ALL and total body irradiation (TBI)‑based conditioning in Ph‑negative ALL were associated with reduced CNS relapse risk.
Key learning: Ph-positive ALL and high WBC are significant risk factors for CNS relapse following allo-HSCT, with PMR further increasing risk in Ph‑positive ALL. The data confirm the importance of CNS-penetrating tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in salvage therapy for long-term disease control post‑allo‑HSCT CNS relapse, particularly in Ph‑positive ALL.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content