All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.
The all Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the all Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The all and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen, Autolus, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View ALL content recommended for you
The phase II prospective Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 10403 trial (NCT00558519) demonstrated excellent outcomes in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), leading to significant change in clinical practice. However, high rates of protocol non-completion and Grade 3–4 asparaginase-related adverse events highlighted the challenges in administering the CALGB 10403 regimen in this population. A real-world retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the CALGB 10403 regimen in AYA patients with B-cell or T-cell Philadelphia-negative ALL. The results were published by DaSilva et al. in Blood Neoplasia. The study cohort included 139 AYA patients who received the CALGB 10403 regimen between October 2012 and June 2020. The primary endpoints were induction response rate, 3-year event-free survival, and overall survival. The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 5–127 months).
|
Key learnings |
The CR/CRi rate by the end of induction was 88% (122/139). Among patients achieving CR/CRi, 58% (108/122) achieved MRD-negative remission by FC and/or NGS. Maintenance chemotherapy was completed by 35% of patients. |
The 3-year EFS and OS rates were 66% (95% CI, 55–74) and 81% (95% CI, 74–87), respectively. Inferior EFS was associated with Hispanic ethnicity (HR, 2.00; p = 0.03), B-ALL (HR, 2.45; p = 0.03), and Ph-like genetics (HR, 3.05; p = 0.014). |
ALT elevation (22%), sepsis (14%), and bilirubin elevation (12%) were the most common Grade 3 or 4 AEs during induction, while ALT elevation (36%), AST elevation (20%), and sepsis (17%) were the most common Grade 3 or 4 AEs post-remission. |
The CALGB 10403 regimen showed comparable efficacy and safety in the real world compared with the clinical trial. Completion of maintenance therapy remained low, warranting further research to improve outcomes and regimen tolerability in AYA patients. |
AE, adverse event; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AYA, adolescent and young adult; B-ALL, B-cell ALL; CALGB, Cancer and Leukemia Group B; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete remission; CRi, complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery; EFS, event-free survival; FC, flow cytometry; HR, hazard ratio; MRD, measurable residual disease; NGS, next-generation sequencing; OS, overall survival; Ph-like, Philadelphia chromosome-like.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
What treatment goals are most important to your older adult ALL patients?