All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know ALL.

  TRANSLATE

The ALL Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the ALL Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The ALL Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The ALL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Amgen and Autolus. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

PETHEMA LAL-2019: Genetics and MRD for therapy allocation in Ph− ALL

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jun 8, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


Results from the prospective, multicenter PETHEMA LAL-2019 (NCT04179929) study, evaluating combined centralized genetics and measurable residual disease (MRD) for post-induction therapy allocation in adults (aged 18–60 years) with B-cell precursor (BCP) Philadelphia chromosome–negative (Ph−) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and T-cell ALL, were published in Blood by Ribera et al. Patients with high genetic risk (HGR), those who required two induction cycles to reach complete remission (CR), patients with CR and measurable residual disease (MRD) ≥0.01% at end-of-induction (EoI)-1, MRD ≥0.001% at the end of early consolidation/reinduction, and any patient with early T-ALL (ETP-ALL) were assigned to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT; n = 243), while remaining patients were assigned to chemotherapy (n = 157). The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included CR and MRD response rates, event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR).

Key data: At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, the 3-year OS probability was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58–69%). The 3-year OS rate was significantly higher among patients assigned to chemotherapy compared with allo-HSCT (81% vs 54%; p < 0.001). The CIR was higher among patients assigned to allo-HSCT vs chemotherapy (46% vs 30%; p = 0.003). Patients with EoI MRD <0.01% without HGR (n = 109) achieved 3-year OS of 81% (95% CI, 70–89%) vs 50% (95% CI, 34–63%) for patients with EOI MRD <0.01% with HGR (n = 64; p < 0.001). 

Key learning: Combining centrally assessed baseline genetics with early MRD response enables accurate post-remission treatment allocation in adults with Ph− ALL, confirming the independent prognostic significance of HGR, particularly in BCP-ALL.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content